Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Offensive Patterns Analysis of Thai Nation Team in Volleyball Women’s Nations League 2022

Received: 28 March 2024     Accepted: 11 April 2024     Published: 29 April 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Effective offensive patterns are crucial for volleyball athletes, enabling quick and forceful attacks to strategically place the ball and impact the game. This study aimed to analyze the offensive strategies and outcomes of the Thai national team during the 2022 Women's Volleyball Nations League (VNL), comparing them with the opposing teams. Using a specific match model from the 13 matches and 51 sets held between May 31 and July 14, 2022, a total of 3,151 attack results were examined. Results were reported through means, standard deviations, percentages, and independent sample t-test statistical analysis for inter-group differences. The findings revealed that the Thai team predominantly utilized the curve ball spike (C) as the most aggressive offensive pattern (10.31±3.43), constituting 37.44% per match. The team's offensive performance showed a high score for successful attacks (ACE) at 35.08±10.75, equivalent to 28.79% per match. Comparative analysis indicated statistically significant differences in three offensive patterns at a 0.05 significance level. Notably, the Thai team excelled in the 3-meter ball spike (3M) at 24.38±8.00 (20.01% per match), fast spike (A) at 10.31±3.43 (8.46% per match), and dummy (X) at 6.23±3.81 (5.11% per match). However, there was no statistical difference in attack outcomes between the Thai team and the opponents. The Thai team's preference for the curve ball spike (C) constituted 37.44% per match, with a corresponding 28.79% success rate in attack scores (ACE). Notably, the 3M, A, and X offensive patterns exhibited significant differences between the Thai team and their opponents, while attack results showed no statistical variance.

Published in American Journal of Sports Science (Volume 12, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11
Page(s) 12-19
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Performance Analysis, Volleyball, Offensive Patterns

References
[1] Silva, M., Marcelino, R., Lacerda, D., & João, P. V. (2016). Match Analysis in Volleyball: a systematic review. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5(1), 35.
[2] International Federation of Volleyball. (2022). WORLD RANKING. Retrieved October 1, 2022 from
[3] Rangubhet KR, Chailert P, Pranee U. Effect of Volleyball Scoring Performance Analysis on the Women's VNL 2021 Championship Team. In 2023 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON) 2023 Mar 22 (pp. 498- 501). IEEE.
[4] Muazu Musa R, Abdul Majeed AP, Suhaimi MZ, Mohd Razman MA, Abdullah MR, Abu Osman NA. Nature of volleyball sport, performance analysis in volleyball, and the recent advances of machine learning application in sports. Machine Learning in Elite Volleyball: Integrating Performance Analysis, Competition and Training Strategies. 2021 Jun 19: 1-11.
[5] Mantor R, Prawonganupharp P, Valunpion A, Rangubhet KR. Performance Analysis of Win score and Lose score in Beach Volleyball. In Proceeding of the 10th Science Research Conference 2018 (pp. BI305-BI310).
[6] Fellingham GW. Evaluating the performance of elite level volleyball players. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports. 2022 Mar 26; 18(1): 15-34.
[7] Drikos S, Sotiropoulos K, Gkreka S, Tsakiri M, Barzouka K. Variations in Attack Patterns between Female and Male outside hitters in top-level Volleyball. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2023 Feb; 18(1): 245-56.
[8] Pahlevi A, Munir A. Influence of Small-Sided Games and Motor Ability in Performance Games Development. JUMORA: Jurnal Moderasi Olahraga. 2023 Jun 19; 3(1): 1-0.
[9] Nascimento MH, Laporta L, Rocha AC, de Lira CA, Campos MH, Pedrosa GF, da Silva Guimarães J, Rodrigues MC, Leonardi TJ, de Oliveira Castro H, Costa GD. Decision making in men's high- level volleyball: analysis of the setter based on game performance. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2023 Mar 1; 23(3): 603-12.
[10] Liu M, Yuan F. Comparative analysis on the offensive and defensive effects of the auxiliary offensive players in the final four teams of the 2019 Women's Volleyball World Cup. In International Conference of Sports Science-AESA 2022 Mar 8 (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 32-32).
[11] de Leeuw AW, van Baar R, Knobbe A, van der Zwaard S. Modeling match performance in elite volleyball players: importance of jump load and strength training characteristics. Sensors. 2022 Oct 20; 22(20): 7996.
[12] Alvarado Ruano R, López Martínez AB. Analysis of technical-tactical factors in beach volleyball: a systematic review. Cultura Ciencia_Deporte [CCD]. 2022; 17(52).
[13] Giatsis G, Drikos S, Lola A. Analysis of match report indicators in men's volleyball Olympics and world championships (2014–2021) depending on the type of final score. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2023 Jun; 18(3): 874-82.
[14] Molina-Martín JJ, Diez-Vega I, López E. Reception-Attack Transition in Volleyball: Analysis of Spike Effectiveness. Apunts. Educació Física i Esports. 2022 Jul 1(149): 53-62.
[15] Wahyudi A, Wijayanti DG. Analysis of the Attack Area on the Indonesian Junior Team Volleyball Game at the 2019 Asean School Games. ACTIVE: Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation. 2022 Apr 8; 11(1): 26-9.
[16] Rangubhet KR. Performance Analysis System for Volleyball: Volleyball Performance Indicators. Academic Journal of Thailand National Sports University. 2022 Aug 22; 14(3): 13-24.
[17] Degrenne O, Langlois V, Paulo A, Éloi S, Mouchet A. The role of performance analysis within the coaching process: Dealing with failure in volleyball side out attack. Movement & Sport Sciences. 2023(1): 47-60.
[18] Santi K, Rangubhet KR. Attack Performance Model Analysis: Outside Spiker of the Champion Women's Team in Volleyball Nations League 2022. In 2023 Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology with ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI DAMT & NCON) 2023 Mar 22 (pp. 506-510). IEEE.
[19] Rangubhet KR. Innovation analysis of performance in beach volleyball. National Conference Science Research. Faculty of Science Srinakharinwirot University, Prasarnmit, Bangkok. 2019 May 23-24: 242-251.
[20] Peña J, Rodríguez-Guerra J, Serra N. Which skills and factors better predict winning and losing in high-level men's volleyball. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research. 2013 Sep 1; 27(9): 2487-93.
[21] Sanguanpong. U. Handbook of volleyball coaches. Bangkok: Printing Office Veterans Welfare Organization under the royal patronage; 2011.
[22] Department of Physical Education, Ministry of Tourism and Sports. Volleyball Coach's Manual T- Certificate. Bangkok: Office of the War Veterans Organization Printing Business under Royal Patronage; 2013.
[23] Subprasert V, Santibutr N, Chootsongnern P. Analyzing and Comparing the Skill Effectiveness Between Successful and Unsuccessful Female Volleyball Teams in the Nations League Women’s Volleyball Tournament 2019. Journal of Sports Science and Health. 2021 Aug. 30; 22 No. 2(1513-7430): 230-40.
[24] Suwanno T, Phangyang N, Adnala N, Sunthorn T, & Chinasi C. Analysis of the Asian Women's Volleyball Championship 2019. Thaksin University Online Journal (TSU OJ). 2022; 2022(4): SS-03(16).
[25] Rangubhet. KR. Performance analysis system in volleyball: efficiency and scoring ability. Journal of Wichcha, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University 2021; 40 No. 2: 71-81.
[26] Marszałek J, Molik B, Gomez MA. Game efficiency of elite male sitting volleyball players with regard to athletes’ physical impairment. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2018 Jun; 13(3): 383-90.
[27] García-de-Alcaraz A, Díez-Fernández DM, Baena-Raya A. Physical-Performance Changes Over the Season: Are They Related to Game-Performance Indicators in Elite Men Volleyball Players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2023 Apr 26; 1(aop): 1-8.
[28] Palao JM. Side-out success and ways that points are obtained in women’s college volleyball. Journal of Sports Analytics. 2018 Jan 1; 4(4): 243-50.
[29] Supamit K. A comparative study of hitting strategies in women's volleyball of successful teams and unsuccessful teams in the 2012 Olympic Games. Chulalongkorn University. Journal of Academic Sciences. Sports and Health 2013, Issue 2, 1-13.
[30] Stutzig N, Zimmermann B, Büsch D, Siebert T. Analysis of game variables to predict scoring and performance levels in elite men’s volleyball. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2015 Dec 1; 15(3): 816-29.
[31] Drikos S, Barzouka K, Balasas DG, Sotiropoulos K. Effect of quality of opposition on game performance indicators in elite male volleyball. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching. 2022 Feb; 17(1): 169-77.
[32] O'Donoghue P, Holmes L, Robinson G. Doing a research Project in sport performance analysis. Routledge; 2017 Jul 28.
[33] Yousif TA, Almogami AH, Khadim WI. Analysis of the Effectiveness of Offensive Skill Performance according to a Computer Based Analytical Program for Professional Players in the Iraqi Volleyball League. Revista iberoamericana de psicología del ejercicio y el deporte. 2023; 18(2): 185-9.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Luangtrongkit, S., Kongtongkum, P., Rangubhet, K. R. (2024). Offensive Patterns Analysis of Thai Nation Team in Volleyball Women’s Nations League 2022. American Journal of Sports Science, 12(2), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Luangtrongkit, S.; Kongtongkum, P.; Rangubhet, K. R. Offensive Patterns Analysis of Thai Nation Team in Volleyball Women’s Nations League 2022. Am. J. Sports Sci. 2024, 12(2), 12-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Luangtrongkit S, Kongtongkum P, Rangubhet KR. Offensive Patterns Analysis of Thai Nation Team in Volleyball Women’s Nations League 2022. Am J Sports Sci. 2024;12(2):12-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11,
      author = {Suriyon Luangtrongkit and Pitirat Kongtongkum and K. Ravivuth Rangubhet},
      title = {Offensive Patterns Analysis of Thai Nation Team in Volleyball Women’s Nations League 2022
    },
      journal = {American Journal of Sports Science},
      volume = {12},
      number = {2},
      pages = {12-19},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajss.20241202.11},
      abstract = {Effective offensive patterns are crucial for volleyball athletes, enabling quick and forceful attacks to strategically place the ball and impact the game. This study aimed to analyze the offensive strategies and outcomes of the Thai national team during the 2022 Women's Volleyball Nations League (VNL), comparing them with the opposing teams. Using a specific match model from the 13 matches and 51 sets held between May 31 and July 14, 2022, a total of 3,151 attack results were examined. Results were reported through means, standard deviations, percentages, and independent sample t-test statistical analysis for inter-group differences. The findings revealed that the Thai team predominantly utilized the curve ball spike (C) as the most aggressive offensive pattern (10.31±3.43), constituting 37.44% per match. The team's offensive performance showed a high score for successful attacks (ACE) at 35.08±10.75, equivalent to 28.79% per match. Comparative analysis indicated statistically significant differences in three offensive patterns at a 0.05 significance level. Notably, the Thai team excelled in the 3-meter ball spike (3M) at 24.38±8.00 (20.01% per match), fast spike (A) at 10.31±3.43 (8.46% per match), and dummy (X) at 6.23±3.81 (5.11% per match). However, there was no statistical difference in attack outcomes between the Thai team and the opponents. The Thai team's preference for the curve ball spike (C) constituted 37.44% per match, with a corresponding 28.79% success rate in attack scores (ACE). Notably, the 3M, A, and X offensive patterns exhibited significant differences between the Thai team and their opponents, while attack results showed no statistical variance.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Offensive Patterns Analysis of Thai Nation Team in Volleyball Women’s Nations League 2022
    
    AU  - Suriyon Luangtrongkit
    AU  - Pitirat Kongtongkum
    AU  - K. Ravivuth Rangubhet
    Y1  - 2024/04/29
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11
    T2  - American Journal of Sports Science
    JF  - American Journal of Sports Science
    JO  - American Journal of Sports Science
    SP  - 12
    EP  - 19
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8540
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajss.20241202.11
    AB  - Effective offensive patterns are crucial for volleyball athletes, enabling quick and forceful attacks to strategically place the ball and impact the game. This study aimed to analyze the offensive strategies and outcomes of the Thai national team during the 2022 Women's Volleyball Nations League (VNL), comparing them with the opposing teams. Using a specific match model from the 13 matches and 51 sets held between May 31 and July 14, 2022, a total of 3,151 attack results were examined. Results were reported through means, standard deviations, percentages, and independent sample t-test statistical analysis for inter-group differences. The findings revealed that the Thai team predominantly utilized the curve ball spike (C) as the most aggressive offensive pattern (10.31±3.43), constituting 37.44% per match. The team's offensive performance showed a high score for successful attacks (ACE) at 35.08±10.75, equivalent to 28.79% per match. Comparative analysis indicated statistically significant differences in three offensive patterns at a 0.05 significance level. Notably, the Thai team excelled in the 3-meter ball spike (3M) at 24.38±8.00 (20.01% per match), fast spike (A) at 10.31±3.43 (8.46% per match), and dummy (X) at 6.23±3.81 (5.11% per match). However, there was no statistical difference in attack outcomes between the Thai team and the opponents. The Thai team's preference for the curve ball spike (C) constituted 37.44% per match, with a corresponding 28.79% success rate in attack scores (ACE). Notably, the 3M, A, and X offensive patterns exhibited significant differences between the Thai team and their opponents, while attack results showed no statistical variance.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections